J. M. SAUCER, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1922-01-01
All concur.
83 Fla. 79 Florida Supreme Court (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment herein rendered by the County Judge and affirmed by the Circuit Court is quashed on the authority of the ease of Saucer v. State, No. 1, this day filed.

All concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dodson v. Solomon, 134 Fla. 284 (Fla. 1938)
    …or the court to determine; and where, as here, the evidence would not in law support a verdict for the plaintiff, there can be no recovery and the court should direct a verdict for the defendant. See Smith, Richardson & Conroy v. Tampa Electric Co., 83 Fla. 79, 89 So. 352; Jones v. General Accident, Fire & Life Ins. Corp., 103 Fla. 787, 137 So. 889. In the case of Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co., 81 Fla. 512, text p. 519, 88 So. 303, this Court had before it the question of directing a verdict, as in the c…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw