MANFREDO ORTIZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1997-02-14
No. 95-03622
PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
689 So. 2d 353 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence. Because this court lacks the authority to review the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s motion for case reassignment, we are precluded from reaching the substantive issues raised. Wild v. Dozier, 672 So. 2d 16, 18 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • 1-888-Traffic Schs. v. Chief Circuit Judge, 734 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 1999)
    …Provider 2. At the end of the information sheet, the Clerk shall include language in substantially the following form: THIS LIST MAY NOT INCLUDE EVERY PROVIDER, PLEASE CONSULT YOUR TELEPHONE DIRECTORY FOR OTHER LISTINGS . See also Ortiz v. State, 689 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (district court lacked authority to review denial of motion for case reassignment); Green v. State, 694 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (district court lacked jurisdiction to review case assignments within the circuit court). . But…
  • Green v. State, 694 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
    …supreme court. This court lacks jurisdiction to review case assignments within the circuit court. See Wild v. Dozier, 672 So. 2d 16, 17 (Fla.1996) (finding the supreme court has exclusive jurisdiction to review judicial assignments); Ortiz v. State, 689 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (finding the district court lacks the authority to review a motion for case reassignment). See also Rivkind v. Patterson, 672 So. 2d 819 (Fla.1996); Holsman v. Cohen, 667 So. 2d 769 (Fla.1996). By adopting this position, we ackno…
  • …rt lacks the authority to review matters relating to judicial assignments arising out of administrative orders, “we are precluded from reaching the substantive issues raised,” and therefore we dismiss this portion of the petition. Ortiz v. State, 689 So. 2d 353, 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); see also Wild v. Dozier, 672 So. 2d 16, 18 (Fla. 1996) (“Accordingly, we hold that a litigant who is affected by a judicial assignment made by a chief judge of a judicial circuit must challenge the assignment in the trial…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw