POWERMATIC, INC., A DIVISION OF STANWHICH INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
BISMAR GONZALEZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-02-26
Nos. 95-2463, 95-1875
Before JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
688 So. 2d 426 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 768.81(3), Fla. Stat. (1995); Cody v. Kernaghan, 682 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Perry v. Red Wing Shoe Co., 597 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Moorman v. American Safety Equipment, 594 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 606 So. 2d 1164 (Fla.1992); Tallahassee Furniture Co., Inc. v. Harrison, 583 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), review denied, 595 So. 2d 558 (Fla.1992); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzie, 502 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 511 So. 2d 299 (Fla.1987); Gainey v. Perkins, 500 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Ford Motor Co. v. Hill, 381 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), app’d, 404 So. 2d 1049 (Fla.1981).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw