WUESTHOFF MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND JOHNS EASTERN COMPANY, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
JULIA TAPIA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that lost expert witness revenue due to cancellation is not a taxable cost under section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes.
The judge of compensation claims taxed expert fees for a cancelled hearing, reasoning that the expert lost income by preparing to testify. The employe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Expert Witness Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
BENTON, Judge.
In the order under review, the judge of compensation claims ruled “properly taxable” Dr. Gary Weiss’s fees in the amount of $1,950 for “cancellation of 4 hours patients for Workers’ Compensation hearing.” The order recited that the day before the scheduled hearing, the “Employer/Carrier accepted the Claimant as permanently and totally disabled. ... This acceptance was more than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing time.” Because the question was resolved by agreement, Dr. Weiss never testified.
Under certain circumstances, costs an expert reasonably incurs in preparing testimony may be taxed, even though the testimony proves unnecessary. Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 583 So. 2d 1022 (Fla.1991). On that basis, Dr. Weiss’ $450 bill for an independent medical examination of the claimant was properly taxed.
But we cannot agree that monies which might have come to Dr. Weiss if he had not planned to appear as an expert witness are “reasonable costs of such proceedings” within the meaning of section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes (1993). The parties have cited no precedent and we are aware of none for taxing as costs revenues an expert witness loses because his testimony proves unnecessary.
Accordingly, the order is modified by reducing the taxable costs by $1950 and, as modified, affirmed.
BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Raghunath Deshpande (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)…2 Fla. Jur 2d Costs § 70 Expert Fees (2020). We recognize that “[u]nder certain circumstances, costs an expert reasonably incurs in preparing testimony may be taxed, even though the testimony proves unnecessary.” Wuesthoff Mem’l Hosp. v. Tapia, 687 So. 2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (citing Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 583 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 1991)). Under such circumstances, it is incumbent on the trial court “to determine exactly which expenses would have been reasonably necessary for…
-
Boca View Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Lepselter (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil OIL Corp., 583 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 1991)