MOWREY ELEVATOR COMPANY AND CLAIMS CENTER, INC., APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
EDWARD L. PRICE, III, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed denial of temporary total disability benefits from July 6, 1993 through May 9, 1994, finding the judge of compensation claims' decision logically inconsistent with medical evidence showing claimant's condition had improved, not deteriorated, since leaving work.
An award of temporary total disability benefits cannot logically be denied for the period before an independent medical examination and granted for the period after when medical evidence shows the claimant's condition improved rather than deteriorated during that time.
[1] Temporary total disability benefits cannot be logically denied for a pre-examination period and awarded for a post-examination period when medical evidence demonstrates t…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“It is illogical to deny TTD benefits for the period before the IME and grant them for the period afterwards, when the only evidence was that his condition had improved.”
Court explaining why the compensation judge's decision was internally inconsistent and unsupported by the medical evidence.
Edward L. Price III, a claimant with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left his job and sought workers' compensation benefits. Dr. McCoy performe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Independent Medical Examination cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm that portion of the compensation order which is the subject of the employer/carrier’s appeal, as it is supported by competent, substantial evidence. We reverse that part of the order denying cross-appellant’s claim for temporary disability from July 6, 1993, through May 9, 1994, because the record does not support the denial.
• Based on the testimony of claimant’s attending physician, the judge of compensation claims inconsistently awarded claimant temporary total disability (TTD) benefits from May 9,1994 — the date Dr. McCoy performed an independent medical examination (IME) on claimant and found him to be temporarily and totally disabled — through September 26, 1995, the date of the hearing. Dr. McCoy considered claimant to be on a continuing TTD status when he saw him, and there is no evidence that claimant’s condition had deteriorated between the time he had left his job and when he was examined by Dr. McCoy. Instead, there was only evidence that Price’s chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had improved since he left the work environment. It is illogical to deny TTD benefits for the period'before the IME and grant them for the period afterwards, when the only evidence was that his condition had improved.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
ERVIN and KAHN, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., concurs and dissents with written opinion.
BENTON, Judge,
concurring and dissenting.
I would affirm the order under review in its entirety, in light of evidence that Mr. Price worked part of the time between July 6, 1993, and May 9, 1994, and in the absence of medical evidence of his condition during that period.