DOEHLER HEAD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1997-01-10
No. 95-02816
THREADGILL, C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
687 So. 2d 281 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the disposition but remanded to strike certain conditions of probation/community control and costs that were not orally pronounced.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant pleaded nolo contendere to credit card fraud, forgery, and tampering with a witness and was sentenced. He challenged several conditions …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Doehler Head challenges certain conditions of probation/community control and costs and fee items imposed after he pleaded nolo contendere to credit card fraud, forgery and tampering with a witness. Head was sentenced to time served on the credit card fraud charge, two years’ community control followed by three years’ probation on the tampering charge, and five years’ probation on the forgery charge with that probation to run consecutive to the community control and probation imposed for tampering with a witness. We affirm this disposition but remand to strike certain conditions of probation/community control and costs.

Head challenges all or a part of ten conditions of probation/eommunity control. We remand for modification or deletion of two of them. The other eight are general conditions of probation/community control contained in the statutes or on the forms attached to the rules and need not be orally pronounced at sentencing. State v. Hart, 668 So. 2d 589 (Fla.1996). Condition 15 which requires Head to keep an hourly log is a special condition of probation/eommunity control which was not orally pronounced and is hereby stricken. Green v. State, 667 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We also strike the portion of condition 12 which requires Head to pay for blood, alcohol, breathalyzer and urinalysis testing. This is a special condition which must be orally pronounced before imposition. Reiter v. State, 674 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Finally, we strike the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1995). This is a discretionary cost item which must be orally pronounced before imposition. Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

The judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

THREADGILL, C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ramsey v. State, 693 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
    …araphernalia. We affirm his convictions without discussion. However, we strike the portion of special probation condition (A) which requires appellant to pay for drug and alcohol testing because it was not announced at sentencing. See Head v. State, 687 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We affirm the sentences in all other respects. PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw