EVANS REESE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-12-04
No. 96-1948
Before COPE, GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
683 So. 2d 645 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Evans Reese appeals his conviction of two counts of armed robbery and his adjudication as a habitual violent felony offender. The convictions and sentences are affirmed. We decline to reach on direct appeal defendant-appellant’s claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. See Whitaker v. State, 433 So. 2d 1352, 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); see also Helton v. State, 641 So. 2d 146, 154 n. 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), review denied, 651 So. 2d 1194 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 111, 133 L.Ed.2d 63 (1995).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Evans Reese v. State, 896 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …COPE, J. Evans Reese appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm. Defendant-appellant was convicted of armed robbery. The conviction was affirmed in 1996. See Reese v. State, 683 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). By motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the defendant argues that he was vindictively sentenced. The trial court correctly denied the motion because a vindictive sentencing claim…
  • Evans Reese v. State, 7 So. 3d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw