DOUGLAS W. ABRUZZO, APPELLANT,
v.
ARTHUR G. HALLER AND ARTHUR G. HALLER, P.A., APPELLEE
DOUGLAS W. ABRUZZO, APPELLANT,
ARTHUR G. HALLER AND ARTHUR G. HALLER, P.A., APPELLEE
682 So. 2d 228
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant failed to pay the applicable clerk’s fee due as a result of the transfer of his action to the proper court, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the instant action without prejudice pursuant to rule 1.060(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See, Burke Co. v. United States Tel. Co., 571 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
T.W.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…more than sixty days after the disposition hearing. Accordingly, we vacate the orders of restitution because restitution was not imposed and ordered at the disposition hearing or within sixty days thereafter. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(b); C.B.L. v. State, 682 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); C.B. v. State, 647 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Scott v. State, 629 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Campbell, 614 So. 2d at 600 (reversing restitution order imposed more than 60 days after sentencing because trial court’s stat…
Authorities Cited
- The Burke Co. v. United States Tel. Co., 571 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)