SADCO, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

COUNTRYWIDE FUNDING, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• McKNIGHT v. State, 727 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …are bound to resolve all doubts in favor of a statute’s constitutionality, “provided the statute may be given a fair construction that is consistent with the federal and state constitutions as well as with the legislative intent.” State v. Stalder, 680 So. 2d 1072, 1076 (Fla.1994)(quoting State v. Elder, 382 So. 2d 687, 690 (Fla.1980)). Additionally, “[w]hen-ever possible, a statute should be construed so as not to conflict with the constitution.” Firestone v. News-Press Publ’g Co., Inc., 538 So. 2d 457, 459-…
• Bymel v. Bank OF Am., N.A., 159 So. 3d 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …rchaser of property which was then the subject of a mortgage foreclosure action and accompanying lis pendens by Peoples Downtown National Bank, was not entitled to intervene in such action.” Id. at 1107; see SADCO, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680 So. 2d 1072, 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (affirming denial of motion to intervene in a residential foreclosure action citing to Andresix for the proposition that a “purchaser of property that was subject of lis pendens arising from bank’s foreclosure action was not…
• Bonafide Props. Only Under 14329 Vill. View Dr Land Tr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, 198 So. 3d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …524, 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (“This court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente life is not entitled to intervene.” (quoting Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 531, 531 (Fla.1927))); SADCO, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680 So. 2d 1072, 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (“[A] purchaser of property that was [the] subject of [a] lis pendens arising from [a] bank’s pending foreclosure action [is] not entitled to intervene in that action.”); Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Doumtown Nat’l Bank, 419 So…

Authorities Cited

• Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat'l Bank, 419 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)