JAMES RICHARD DEGON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES RICHARD DEGON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
680 So. 2d 454
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without further discussion the revocation of appellant’s probation. However, we vacate appellant’s sentence because the trial court did not have before it a score-sheet at the time of sentencing, and it cannot be determined whether appellant received a guidelines sentence absent a scoresheet. E.g., Brown v. State, 623 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So. 2d 627 (Fla.1994); Barr v. State, 474 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). On remand, the trial court is directed to resentence appellant, with reference to a properly prepared scoresheet.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.
ERVIN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ford v. State, 724 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…t’s pro se brief/petition for writ of habeas corpus and conclude that there is no basis to find that the trial court erred when it denied appellant’s request for 215 days credit for the time spent in the restitution center. See e.g. Martin v. State, 680 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). AFFIRMED. DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Barr v. State, 474 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Brown v. State, 623 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)