DENNIS MANCUSO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DENNIS MANCUSO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
679 So. 2d 1316
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence except as to special conditions 9,11 and 12 which were not orally pronounced by the trial court, and special condition 19 which does not conform to the oral pronouncements.
We reverse special conditions 9, 11 and 12 and remand with direction to strike same. As to special condition 19, we remand with direction to conform same to the oral pronouncement.
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and. STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Prime Hospitality Corp. v. Gaylene Simms and Terrance Simms, 700 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…. The court concluded that leaving an unlocked, unattended office in Dadeland Towers could be considered comparative negligence. The appellee/wife in the instant case did not leave her hotel room door unlocked. In Hardee v. Cunningham & Smith, Inc., 679 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), this court held that the issue of comparative negligence could be submitted to the jury where the victim was assaulted at night at a car wash which he should have known was in an area of criminal activity. It is undisputed in th…