LANRY E. BROCKELBANK, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
LANRY E. BROCKELBANK, APPELLANT,
HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
679 So. 2d 858
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of the circuit court denying the petition for writ of mandamus with directions to consider the forfeiture of gain-time issue on the merits. We affirm that portion of the order which denied relief on the issue of sentence structure.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.
ERVIN, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Conway v. Conway, 111 So. 3d 925 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…novo standard. Wood v. Unknown Personal Representative of Estate of Burnette, 56 So. 3d 74, 76 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2011). We have consistently reversed trial court orders that fail to award prejudgment interest on support arrearages. See Miller v. Miller, 679 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Nelson-Higdon v. Higdon, 680 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Thurman v. Thurman, 637 So. 2d 64, 65 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). In this case, the trial court did not elaborate in its Final Order as to why it was declining to award any…
-
Gremel v. Gremel, 45 So. 3d 978 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…911 So. 2d 262, 271 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“[TJhe court ... would err by declining to award prejudgment interest for arrearages. Courts must award prejudgment interest on arrearages found to be due in the final judgment.”); see also Miller v. Miller, 679 So. 2d 858, 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“[TJhe trial court erred in failing to award prejudgment interest on the child support and alimony arrearag-es.”). Because the final judgment of dissolution fails to address this issue, we remand for the trial court to do s…