SANDRA N. HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD D. HERNANDEZ, APPELLEE
SANDRA N. HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT,
RICHARD D. HERNANDEZ, APPELLEE
679 So. 2d 57
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm a temporary order modifying custody. On the record before the court, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s concluding, after fourteen hours of hearing, that it was in the best interest of the child to reside temporarily with the father. As to all issues raised, there is sufficient evidence to support this exercise of discretion. We note that there is no question here that Appellant had sufficient notice and ample opportunity to be heard.
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
G.L. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 80 So. 3d 1065 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…ndards of the ICWA. If, after notice and a hearing, the trial court determines that T.M.L. is not an Indian child, the trial court may re-enter the termination order terminating the rights of the parents. See S.B. v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 679 So. 2d 57, 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (reversing order terminating parental rights but stating that on remand, upon resolving notice issue, court may re-issue termination order). REVERSED AND REMANDED. TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur. . Federal law preempts stat…