JOHN DAVID DILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.720(D)(1) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders
appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences, but strike the imposition of the public defender’s fee because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fee. See Allmond v. State, 668 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Although a separate final judgment for the fee advised appellant of the right to object within thirty days, the judgment does not show that a copy was.served on appellant. Andino v. State, 676 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fee after compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1).
JUDGMENTS and SENTENCES AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; REMANDED.
COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gardiner v. Gardiner, 705 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…also testified that he had purchased a boat and a Mercedes, and had a CD worth $8500. His longest period of unemployment had been two months. Under these circumstances, a suspension of payment was appropriate but not a modification. Fazio v. Walton, 678 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). In summary, we affirm the order except Robert should be given the opportunity to have his payments suspended until he is employed, AFFIRMED with directions. PETERSON, J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Andino v. State, 676 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- Allmond v. State, 668 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)