UNION BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

MARTHA M. HATIN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Porter v. State, 765 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …and the reviewing court will interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling. See McNamara v. State, 357 So. 2d 410, 412 (Fla.1978); Glover v. State, 677 So. 2d 374, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); State v. Houston, 616 So. 2d 595, 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). While we are required to accept the trial court’s determination of the historical facts leading to the search, a defendant is entitled to a de novo review of whethe…
• Origi v. State, 912 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …no “express questioning,” the court applied the functional equivalent test and found that no interrogation had occurred. Id. This court has described Innis as providing a “broad and practical definition of ‘interrogation.’ ” E.g., Glover v. State, 677 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Applying Innis, we conclude that the trooper’s statement to Origi was the “functional equivalent” of interrogation. First, unlike Innis, this case does not involve the police equivalent of a water cooler conversation, where one…
• State v. Manuel, 796 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …ce and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling. See Murray v. State, 692 So. 2d 157, 159 (Fla.1997); McNamara v. State, 357 So. 2d 410, 412 (Fla.1978); Glover v. State, 677 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). In this case, the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress involves a mixed question of fact and law. Hines v. State, 737 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The standard of review for the findings of fact is whether competen…