LOUIS WILSON SAINT PIERRE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Shaunte Collins v. State, 795 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …t his speedy trial rights, and that counsel was ineffective for “conceding” guilt to lesser included offenses. We find appellant’s allegations concerning his speedy trial claim legally sufficient to warrant further examination. See Hankins v. State, 677 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). As to the concession of guilt claim, if counsel had conceded guilt of the lesser included offense, an evidentiary hearing would be required. Having reviewed the portion of the closing arguments provided by appellant, it is cle…
• Williams v. State, 815 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …ter her mistrial). On remand, the trial court should either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute Williams’s claim, or hold an evidentiary hearing. See, e.g., Waldburg v. State, 644 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Hankins v. State, 677 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED for further proceedings. ERVIN, BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur. . Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).…
• Lucious Hankins, Jr. v. State, 105 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …cord reveals, however, that the petitioner previously filed a timely Rule 8.850 motion and argued his attorney was ineffective in failing to assert speedy trial rights. We reversed and remanded the case for an evi-dentiary hearing. Hankins v. State, 677 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The claim was denied on remand, and this court affirmed in Hankins v. State, 728 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Following those proceedings, petitioner has filed at least six additional post-conviction motions and appealed each…