ROOFCRAFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., PATRICK LEAVENS, AND DAVID JONES, APPELLANTS,
v.
WOODIE H. THOMAS, III, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plenary Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Defendants appeal an order granting plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings as to liability only. We have jurisdiction to review such a non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv). The order, however, was entered because months earlier the trial court had struck defendants’ pleadings for discovery violations. The defendants are not arguing that the order on appeal is incorrect, but rather that the order striking the pleadings was erroneous. The appropriate method for defendants to review the order striking the pleadings is by plenary appeal. Karr v. Sellers, 620 So. 2d 1104 (Fla.4th DCA 1993). We therefore affirm without prejudice to defendants appealing the order striking their pleadings after final judgment.
Affirmed.
GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S.D.S. Autos, Inc. v. Chrzanowski, 976 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…, even when the motion to dismiss is appealed in conjunction with an appealable non-final order. Chicago Title Ins. Agency v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 560 So. 2d 296, 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (citations omitted). Accord Roofcraft Int’l, Inc. v. Thomas, 677 So. 2d 39, 39-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); King v. Odle, 665 So. 2d 378, 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); First Union Nat’l Bank v. Peoples Nat’l Bank of Commerce, 644 So. 2d 538, 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Polo v. Polo, 643 So. 2d 55, 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); George J. Karr,…
-
State of Fla. Dep't OF Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Sarnoff, 776 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…is true even when the motion to dismiss is appealed in conjunction with an appealable nonfinal order. Chicago Title Ins. Agency v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 560 So. 2d 296, 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (citations omitted). Accord Roofcraft Int’l v. Thomas, 677 So. 2d 39, 39-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); King v. Odle, 665 So. 2d 378, 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); First Union Nat’l Bank v. Peoples Nat’l Bank of Commerce, 644 So. 2d 538, 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Polo v. Polo, 643 So. 2d 55, 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); George J. Aim; D…
-
In re Est. OF Walter L. Lamb v. Lamb, 763 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…l agreement. The trial court resolved both claims against the personal representa [*364] tives, and they appealed. This court affirmed on the elective share, but remanded the pre-nuptial agreement issue for further proceedings. In re Estate of Lamb, 677 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). On remand the personal representatives voluntarily dismissed their claim that the widow had breached the pre-nuptial agreement, leaving no issues in dispute, and then deeded the home to the widow. The personal representatives h…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Sentry Ins. v. Simonson, 620 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)