DEEP SOUTH PRODUCTS AND WINN DIXIE STORES, APPELLANTS,
v.
SPECIAL DISABILITY TRUST FUND, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the employer/carrier's claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Trust Fund was timely filed.
[1] An employer/carrier's claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Trust Fund is timely if filed within the period allowed under the non-claim provision in section…
[2] The extended filing period in section 440.49(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1987), applies to an employer/carrier's reimbursement claim if the claim remained viable when this s…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe employer/carrier appealed an order denying their claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Trust Fund as untimely. The claim was filed a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Special Disability Trust Fund Reimbursement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The employer/earrier appeal a workers’ compensation order by which a claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Trust Fund was denied as untimely. We conclude that the claim was timely filed in accordance with Special Disability Trust v. F. Benson & Co., 626 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
As established in F. Benson, the extended filing period in section 440.49(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1987), applies to the employer/carrier’s reimbursement claim insofar as the claim remained viable when this statutory enactment became effective. The shorter filing period in section 440.49(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1985), which was in effect on the. date of accident, thus does not pertain in this case except as it confirms the viability of the reimbursement claim when section 440.49(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1987), took effect. Because the employer/carrier’s claim was then viable, and was thereafter filed within the period allowed under the non-claim provision in section 440.49(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1987), it should have been deemed timely.
The ruling in F. Benson is not undermined by the later enactment of section 440.49(12), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), which provides that the applicable law “for the purposes of determining entitlement to reimbursement” is the law in effect on the date of accident. This provision was enacted in connection with various statutory changes to the criteria for reimbursement. See ch. 93^415, § 43, Laws of Florida. We do not construe section 440.49(12), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), as addressing the filing period within which such rights may be invoked. Indeed, such an application of section 440.49(12), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), would be constitutionally impermissible in this case, as it would have the effect of extinguishing an existing claim. See In re Estate of Jelley, 360 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 366 So. 2d 881 (Fla.1978).
The appealed order is reversed, and the case is remanded.
BARFIELD, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re Est. of Clifford M. Jelley v. Hitt, 360 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
- Special Disability Tr. Fund v. F. Benson & Co. & Feisco, 626 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)