ELINOR B. CRUDELE, APPELLANT,
v.
VINCENT A. CRUDELE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-01-03
No. 95-601
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
673 So. 2d 51 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); England v. England, 626 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Young v. Young, 606 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. M.R., 100 So. 3d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
    …resence of police). Alternatively, the State argues there was sufficient attenuation between the two statements to dissipate the taint of the initial illegal custodial interrogation. For these arguments the State relies principally on Mesa v. State, 673 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) and Lundberg v. State, 918 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). These cases are distinguishable. In Mesa, the defendant had given a formal confession to police after invoking his right to counsel. The State conceded the police violate…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw