EDILBERTO O. MARBAN, ESQ., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
LUIS ALBERTO ARIAS, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-03-13
Nos. 95-2359, 95-2940
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
670 So. 2d 1055 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See DiStefano Constr., Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 597 So. 2d 248 (Fla.1992); Baldwin v. Baldwin, 154 Fla. 624, 18 So. 2d 681 (1944); Irwin v. Marko, 408 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), review denied 419 So. 2d 1198 (Fla.1982); Hadlock v. Hadlock, 137 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Moreno v. State, 675 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …ates that a defendant convicted of a second degree misdemeanor may receive up to a six month probationary period. The trial court, therefore, did not err in sentencing the defendant to incarceration and six months of probation. See Merrett v. State, 670 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence and conviction are affirmed in all respects. Affirmed.…
  • Roldan v. State, 676 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …te, 635 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Tennie v. State, 593 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Furthermore, this court has stated, “[t]he right to appeal the investigative costs cannot be waived by the defendant’s failure to object.” Merrett v. State, 670 So. 2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). [*1030] Here, however, defense counsel affirmatively indicated that he had no objection to the costs imposed. As was the ease in Norman v. State, 676 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), this defendant was provided with notice and…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw