MICHAEL WHITFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-03-20
Nos. 95-456, 95-2089
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and COPE, JJ.
669 So. 2d 1131 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Carroll v. State, 497 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 511 So. 2d 297 (1987); Recinos v. State, 420 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Catasus v. Tabone, 19 So. 3d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …ly-revealed personal relationship with parties in the lawsuit, the trial judge should have granted a motion for disqualification in this separate case involving those same parties.1 See Steinhorst v. State, 636 So. 2d 498 (Fla.1994); Houck v. State, 669 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). The present application for prohibition requiring his disqualification is therefore granted. [*428] We are certain that issuance of the formal writ will not be necessary. Prohibition granted. . While it is a fact that the tw…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw