GOLD COAST CHEMICAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cortina v. State of Florida-Dept. OF HRS & Div. of Risk Mgmt., 901 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …its. In Johnson v. Orange County Corrections, 786 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), this court held that a dispute regarding whether an injured worker had achieved MMI supported the claimant’s entitlement to an IME. See also Kimmins Corp. v. Collier, 664 So. 2d 299, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that when E/C defended entitlement to an IME on grounds that claimant had achieved MMI, a dispute arose over claimant’s entitlement to both medical care and indemnity benefits). We, therefore, reverse for the approv…
• Dep't OF Revenue & The Div. of Risk Management-State of Fla. v. Groman, 46 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (accepting jurisdiction under Rule 9.180(b)(1) where JCC compelled discovery over Claimant’s objection regarding JCC’s jurisdiction over case based on absence of pending dispute or claim); with Kimmins Corp. v. Collier, 664 So. 2d 299, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (treating appeal of non-final order compelling IME as writ of certiorari where, notwithstanding E/C’s assertion that JCC lacked “subject matter jurisdiction,” facts in record established pending case before JCC over which JC…
• King v. Parker Hannifin Corp. & Underwriters, Inc., 17 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …are utilized when additional medical evidence is needed to determine whether claimants are entitled to benefits. Thus, an order providing for an IME would clearly not settle the claim that was being adjudicated. See, e.g., Kimmins Corp. v. Collier, 664 So. 2d 299, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that an order requiring an employer/carrier to provide an IME is a nonfinal order for purposes of invoking appellate jurisdiction). In the present case, the parties acknowledged that the PFB requesting an endocrinol…

Authorities Cited

• Mercer v. J.D. Raine, Sr., 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1983)