TONEY R. PHILLIPS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TONEY R. PHILLIPS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
661 So. 2d 424
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Phillips v. State, 651 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). But see Gonzales v. State, 658 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
DAUKSCH, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hall v. State, 675 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…en imposing sentence, gave Hall credit for only 114 days. The court minute form, which apparently serves as the sentence form gives Hall 114 days credit. Thus, we remand this cause to the trial court to resolve this discrepancy. See Aquino v. State, 661 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). PETERSON, C.J., and ANTOON, J., concur. . § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1993). . § 843.02, Fla. Stat. (1993).…
-
Fletcher v. State, 693 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…the concurrent nature of the sentence is the result of a scrivener’s error. However, in order to resolve any uncertainty, we remand for the trial court to resolve the discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written order. Aquino v. State, 661 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Higginbotham v. State, 659 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Marchand v. State, 546 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Wilkins v. State, 543 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 554 So. 2d 1170 (Fla.1989). In all other respects,…
Authorities Cited
- Phillips v. State, 651 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Gonzales v. State, 658 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)