RUPERT WRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1995-07-28
No. 95-1746
GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
659 So. 2d 402 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Judge.

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Whether appellant’s application for relief below is treated as a Rule 3.850 motion or a petition for writ of habeas corpus, it is without merit. Appellate counsel was not ineffective.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …consider any school board officer’s request for reimbursement of reasonable legal expenses pursuant to the statute. An agency, however, has no common law jurisdiction. See E. Cent. Reg’l Wastewater Facilities Operation Bd. v. City of W. Palm Beach, 659 So. 2d 402, 404 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The trial court, not the appel-lee, has jurisdiction to hear common law [*1191] claims. As such, although the trial court properly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the appellant’s statutory claim, it erred…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw