HERBERT L. THOMPSON, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
BARBARA JEANETTE THOMPSON, APPELLEE
HERBERT L. THOMPSON, SR., APPELLANT,
BARBARA JEANETTE THOMPSON, APPELLEE
658 So. 2d 1214
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of dissolution and remand the case with directions to the lower court to make specific findings pursuant to section 61.08, Florida Statutes (1993), as to why it denied appellant’s claim for alimony.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swanston v. Swanston, 746 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…trial court’s determination of one spouse’s needs and the other spouse’s ability to provide for such needs. See McCarty v. McCarty, 710 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Dal Ponte v. Dal Ponte, 692 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Thompson v. Thompson, 658 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jacques v. Jacques, 609 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). This final judgment contains only two findings of fact: that the marriage is irretrievably broken, and that the wife has been a continuous resident of Florida for at least s…
-
Staton v. Staton, 710 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…d (2). These statutorily required findings of fact to support the trial court’s denial of alimony are [*746] not set forth in either the final judgment or in the order on motion for rehearing. The failure to do so is error. See Thompson v. Thompson, 658 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Chapoteau v. Chapoteau, 659 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1995). We reverse the final judgment and remand for the trial court to make the appropriate statutory findings. THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J. concur.…