NIKITA JEROME HARDEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NIKITA JEROME HARDEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
658 So. 2d 680
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AEFIRMED. See Puig v. State, 636 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Highsmith v. State, 617 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wolowitz v. Thoroughbred Motors, Inc., 765 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…t the “contract confirmation” was actually a settlement agreement that the trial court properly enforced. However, this argu [*924] ment fails for two reasons. First, settlement agreements are governed by the law of contracts. See Bateski v. Ransom, 658 So. 2d 680, 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Woodfield Plaza, Ltd. v. Stiles Constr. Co., 687 So. 2d 856, 857 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). As such, they require proof that consideration was given by each party. In this case, there was no evidence that consideration was given b…
Authorities Cited
- Highsmith v. State, 617 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Puig v. State, 636 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)