FELIX NEMBHARD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FELIX NEMBHARD, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
657 So. 2d 971
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant’s motions for mistrial where the impermissible testimony was harmless in light of the other overwhelming evidence of guilt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Orth v. Orndorff, 835 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…tition for an injunction. Thus, the permanent injunction is in direct contravention of sections 741.30(1)(I), (4), and (6)(a), which require the filing of a petition and a hearing on such prior to the issuance of an injunction. See Johnson v. State, 657 So. 2d 971, 971-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (reversing injunction where no petition was filed and no hearing was held). Accordingly, we reverse. WHATLEY and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. DiGUILIO, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)