H. K. BAILEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
J. C. VAN PELT, AS SHERIFF OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
H. K. BAILEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
J. C. VAN PELT, AS SHERIFF OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
78 Fla. 353
Florida Supreme Court (1919)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
— The reasonableness of the regulations alleged to have been knowingly and wilfully violated by the petitioner was not made an issue in this proceeding, and upon the charge made in the information filed against the petitioner, the sufficiency of which was not questioned in the court below, the question of the reasonableness of no specified rule or regulation was presented; but the opinion herein indicates that the validity .and reasonableness of the regulations promulgated and sought to be enforced under the authority of the statutes are subject to judicial review in appropriate proceedings.
Rehearing denied.
Taylor, Whitfield and West,, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson v. Marine Exploration Co., 583 F.2d 1336 (5th Cir. 1978)…le principle * * * for the guidance of an administrative official in the performance of his duties.” Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Anderson, Fla., 1954, 74 So. 2d 544, 547. See also State v. Griffin, Fla., 1970, 239 So. 2d 577; Bailey v. Van Pelt, 1919, 78 Fla. 353, 82 So. 789, 793. Section 310.11 satisfies these precepts. Statutory Hodgepodge MECI has also concocted a mélange of statutory arguments in its endeavor to escape the imposition of pilotage fees. We [*1349] will start with the best (the word is us…