AVERY HOOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AVERY HOOKS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
656 So. 2d 624
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends, and the state concedes, that the trial court did not comply with the requirements of section 921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(18)(A), in imposing an upward departure sentence. We vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing within the guidelines. SENTENCE VACATED and CAUSE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
BOOTH, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Evans v. State, 696 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…hat written reasons supporting departures be timely filed.1 See State v. Colbert, 660 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1995); Ree v. State, 565 So. 2d 1329 (Fla.1990); State v. Pease, 669 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (on motion for clarification); Hooks v. State, 656 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Wilcox v. State, 664 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). [*369] REVERSED and REMANDED for resen-tencing. ERVIN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur. . We are cognizant that our decision appears to conflict with that rendered by the…