FRED WILLIAM SCHROEDER, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1995-06-27
No. 94-1577
WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
656 So. 2d 288 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for a violation of section 827.071(5), Florida Statutes (1993), based upon the decision in Sirmons v. State, 634 So. 2d 153 (Fla.1994). On remand, we direct the trial court to amend the judgment and sentences to reflect this ruling. We conclude that appellant’s remaining arguments merit neither discussion nor reversal. Accordingly, in all other respects the judgment and sentences are affirmed. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Schroeder v. State, 680 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
    …omote related materials; distribution of obscene materials). He was acquitted of Count VI (tampering with a witness). Judgment and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal as to Counts I, II, III, and V, but Count IV was reversed. Schroeder v. State, 656 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Schroeder appeared with counsel at the September 13, 1995, resentencing hearing where, in accordance with our mandate, Count IV was vacated. As Schroeder already had served his one-year sentence in Count V, only Counts I throug…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw