DONALD PARSONS, APPELLANT,
v.
SOVRAN BANK, N.A., A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1995-05-31
No. 94-0835
GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.
655 So. 2d 220 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
FARMER, Judge.

FARMER, Judge.

We affirm domestication of the Michigan judgment. However, we find that Michigan law should be applied to determine the interest due from the date of the complaint to the date of domestication. Therefore, we remand with directions to the trial court to recalculate the interest in accordance with Michigan law.

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Weiss v. Weiss, 100 So. 3d 1220 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
    …2d at 1250. Thus, interest on the amounts due under the Illinois order should have been calculated at the Illinois statutory rate from May 31, 2007, to August 25, 2007, and at the Florida statutory rate thereafter. See Parsons v. Sovran Bank, N.A., 655 So. 2d 220, 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Because the trial court utilized only the Florida rate, the trial court shall recalculate the interest due on the delinquencies upon remand. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent with…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw