HOWARD S. GOLDBERG, APPELLANT,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, ETC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-05-03
No. 94-2881
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
654 So. 2d 288 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The order below is affirmed pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Anderson Columbia Co., Inc. v. State, 695 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
    …result, the Department’s motion did not give Anderson Columbia notice that the Department was challenging Anderson Columbia’s right to recover under the alternative theory of “unforeseen work.” See City of Cooper City v. Sunshine Wireless Co., Inc., 654 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). On appeal, the Department argues forcefully that under the instant facts the explicit language of the specifications precludes Anderson Columbia’s recovery for unforeseen work. The Department contends (i) that hauling materials…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw