DAVID PHILLIP JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
SUSAN HENDRICKS JONES, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1995-02-09
No. 93-4074
ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ„ concur.
649 So. 2d 362 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995) Negative Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. All of the issues raised involve the equitable distribution plan fashioned by the trial court. While the trial court valued and distributed all the assets, it is impossible to ascertain the trial court’s intent concerning the responsibility for the marital liabilities (especially the first and second mortgage on the marital residence).

We are also unable to determine which debts the trial court considered to be marital. Under these circumstances, we must reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings as to the plan of equitable distribution. Trusheim v. Trusheim, 643 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Smith, 659 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1995)
    …SHAW, Justice. We have for review Smith v. State, 649 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), based on conflict with Ashley v. State, 614 So. 2d 486 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently addressed this issue in State v. Blackwell, 661 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1995). We quash Smith and remand…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw