MARCUS MARCEL STAFFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARCUS MARCEL STAFFORD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
648 So. 2d 806
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment and sentence are affirmed. The First Step deposit and the public defender’s hen are vacated without prejudice for the court to reimpose them upon compliance with controlling law. Tibero v. State, 646 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Botts v. State, 634 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Smith v. State, 622 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS VACATED.
HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Segarra v. Segarra, 932 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…he purpose of these privileges is to protect confidential communications between the parties and to encourage people seeking treatment or advice to speak freely on all matters. However, the parties may waive the privileges. See McKinlay v. McKinlay, 648 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). There is no Florida case law that directly addresses whether the psychotherapist-patient privilege is waived in joint counseling sessions. The mother suggests we follow case law from other jurisdictions. See Redding v. Virginia…
-
S. H. Y. v. P. G., 320 So. 3d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)…no different than other statutory privileges and, thus, may not only be expressly waived but also even implicitly waived by "conduct or disclosure that is inconsistent with the maintenance of the privilege." Id. at 981 (citing McKinlay v. McKinlay, 648 So. 2d 806, 810 (Fla. 1st DCA - 7 - 1995) (applying the general body of law holding that statutory privileges such as psychotherapist-patient, lawyer-client, and accountant-client can be waived)); see also Hughes v. Schatzberg, 872 So. 2d 996, 997 (Fla. 4th D…
-
Metz v. State, 650 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…sessment of $1.00 to go to First Step, Inc., which must be stricken, without prejudice for the trial court to reimpose this cost if it can demonstrate a proper statutory basis therefor. State v. Beasley, 580 So. 2d 139 (Fla.1991); Stafford v. State, 648 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Nank v. State, 646 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bradshaw v. State, 638 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Judgment and sentence AFFIRMED; costs relating to First Step, Inc. VACATED. WEBSTER, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tibero v. State, 646 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
- Goshay v. State, 646 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Botts v. State, 634 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
- Bruce v. State, 622 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
- Domena v. State, 622 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)