MARIO VENERO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARIO VENERO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
647 So. 2d 1077
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court properly denied defendant Mario Venero’s attempt to exercise a peremptory challenge against a prospective juror. The record supports the court’s finding that the challenge was improperly motivated by either gender or race. Abshire v. State, 642 So. 2d 542 (Fla.1994); State v. Neil, 457 So. 2d 481 (Fla.1984). Therefore, Venero’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sims v. State, 675 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…n improper consecutive enhanced habitual offender sentences in three separate cases. Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Brooks v. State, 630 So. 2d 527 (Fla.1993); Panda v. State, 647 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). See also, Benjamin v. State, 667 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The record reflects that consecutive habitual offender sentences were imposed for two offenses in each of the three cases. Because the defendant’s allegations tha…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Neil, 457 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1984)
- Abshire v. State, 642 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1994)