TRANS ATLANTIC DISTRIBUTORS, L.P., APPELLANT,
v.
WHILAND AND COMPANY, S.A., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Trans Atlantic Distributors appeals the trial court’s order granting appellees’ motion for attorney’s fees and reserving jurisdiction to determine the amount of fees. This is a non-final, non-appealable order and, therefore, this appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
We deny all motions, but correct one fact recited in our opinion issued on August 17, 1994. The car which struck the decedent was driven by Felipe Baten, not by Nancy Nodine.
GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., and HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McILVEEN v. McILVEEN, 644 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…amount is a nonap-pealable, nonfinal order. See Gonzalez Engineering, Inc. v. Miami Pump & Supply Co., 641 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Trans Atlantic Distributors, L.P. v. Whiland & Co., S.A, 646 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Hobbs v. Hobbs, 518 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Accord Cokonougher v. Cokonougher, 543 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (where the trial court merely reserved jurisdiction to make an award of attorney’s fees, the issue is prema…
-
Lasco Enters., Inc. v. Kohlbrand, 819 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…er which grants a party’s motion for cost but reserves jurisdiction to determine the amount of costs is a non-final, non-appealable order which this court lacks jurisdiction to review. See Trans Atlantic Distributors, L.P. v. Whi- [*828] land & Co., 646 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). AFFIRMED. SHARP, W., J. and PERRY, JR., B., Associate Judge, concur. . See § 713.29, Fla. Stal. (1999). . We note that, even if the trial court had erred in denying Lasco’s motion for a directed verdict, no harm resulted to…
-
Kasai McCLAIN v. State, 709 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…e, the prosecution must prove that there was an express or implied agreement or understanding between two or more persons to deliver or sell the cocaine in the proscribed quantity. Spera v. State, 656 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Webster v. State, 646 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). The state may prove the elements by circumstantial evidence, Castillo v. State, 590 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), but must prove the intent to conspire, the intention to commit the offense, and the existence of the agreement. St…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)