LORRAINE HESSLER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT HESSLER, APPELLANT,
v.
T & N, PLC, F/K/A TURNER & NEWALL, PIC, APPELLEE
LORRAINE HESSLER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT HESSLER, APPELLANT,
T & N, PLC, F/K/A TURNER & NEWALL, PIC, APPELLEE
642 So. 2d 851
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant has failed to demonstrate error or abuse of discretion in (a) the trial court’s exclusion of proposed rebuttal testimony, see Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 528 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), or (b) any ruling as to the elements of the plaintiff’s strict liability claim. See Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F. 2d 1129 (5th Cir.1985).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
- Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir. 1985)
- Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 528 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)