STURGAL CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1994-09-09
No. 94-02884
PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
641 So. 2d 972 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of this motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We note that the trial court mistakenly believed the issues described in grounds 2 and 3 of the motion had been raised on direct appeal. Nonetheless, as pleaded, those grounds are facially insufficient. Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to the prisoner filing another motion that raises these grounds with greater specificity.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 675 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    …thdraws its per curiam affir-mance of May 15, 1996 and substitutes the following opinion. The court affirms the conviction of defendant, but strikes that portion of the final judgment which assesses prospective appellate costs. See Davis v. State, 641 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). KLEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.…
  • McDONALD v. State, 649 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion to suppress. However, we strike the special condition of probation prospectively imposing appellate costs. Davis v. State, 641 So. 2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Anderson v. State, 632 So. 2d 132, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw