THE ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL CONSULTANTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
SPILLIS CANDELA & PARTNERS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1994-01-26
No. 92-1765
GUNTHER, BOBBY W., STONE, BARRY J., and WARNER, MARTHA C., Associate Judges, concur.
639 So. 2d 991 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The standard of review of an order denying attorney’s fees requested under section 772.104, Florida Statutes (1987), is whether the trial court abused its discretion. See Foreman v. E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., 568 So. 2d 531, 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Upon our review of the record in this case and the court’s extensive order, we conclude that appellant has not shown any abuse of discretion. The trial judge conducted all of the proceedings in this case through five years of litigation including a lengthy trial. He clearly has the better vantage point to assess the factual issues involving credibility and weight of the evidence. His order exhibits careful consideration of appellant’s claims.

GUNTHER, BOBBY W., STONE, BARRY J., and WARNER, MARTHA C., Associate Judges, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw