DANILO CUIK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1994-07-19
No. 94-57
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
639 So. 2d 199 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Kehoe v. State, 521 So. 2d 1094, 1096 (Fla.1988); Johnson v. State, 438 So. 2d 774 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1051, 104 S.Ct. 1329, 79 L.Ed.2d 724 (1984); State v. Bonser, 563 So. 2d 161, 162 (Fla. 2d DCA), dismissed, 574 So. 2d 139 (Fla.1990); State v. Taylor, 557 So. 2d 941, 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw