ERICK L. BATH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERICK L. BATH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
639 So. 2d 191
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Mansfield v. State, 618 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gilbert v. State, 659 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1995)…SHAW, Justice. We have for review Gilbert v. State, 639 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), wherein the district court certified the following question: Is section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), facially unconstitutional as vague and overbroad? We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have fo…
-
Salatino v. State, 644 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…992), is vague and overbroad and is, therefore, unconstitutional. We rejected substantially similar arguments in Varney v. State, 638 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (citing Pallas v. State, 636 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)), and Gilbert v. State, 639 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we affirm on this issue, and, as we did in Varney and Gilbert, certify as [*1036] being of great public importance, the following question: IS SECTION 784.048, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1992), FACIALLY UNCONSTITUTION…
Authorities Cited
- Mansfield v. State, 618 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)