CATHERINE LISCHIN, APPELLANT,
v.
DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1994-06-14
No. 93-1872
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
637 So. 2d 391 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment under review is reversed. See and compare Spaulding v. City of Melbourne, 473 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 392 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA) rev. denied 389 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.1980).

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jeromy Bautz v. State, 932 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
    …without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.…
  • Catlin v. State, 929 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
    …egal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Cowart v. State, 749 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Lee v. State, 637 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw