MICHAEL TAUBEN, APPELLANT,
v.
JOE'S STONE CRABS, INC. AND OCCIDENTAL FIRE & CASUALTY CO., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the judge of compensation claims erred by failing to adequately address the statute of limitations defense in light of the claimant's incarceration.
The claimant's workers' compensation claims were denied as time-barred. The claimant had been incarcerated for a significant period after his last emp…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statute Of Limitations Defense cases and more on FLexlaw
WOLF, Judge.
Tauben appeals from a final order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) finding that his claims for compensation, medical care and treatment were time barred by section 440.19, Florida Statutes. We find that the order of the JCC failed to adequately address this issue, and reverse and remand.
The case of USS Agri-Chemicals v. Wad-dell, 537 So. 2d 111 (Fla.1989), holds that when a person is incarcerated and a statute of limitations defense is asserted, the JCC must determine whether the claimant would have qualified for compensation benefits if he had not been incarcerated. We see no reason not to apply this rule to employer-furnished medical treatment.
In this case, the claimant was incarcerated for a substantial portion of the two years immediately after the last medical attention furnished by the employer. Claimant received medical attention while in prison, which he asserts was related to his compensable injury. Immediately upon his release from custody, claimant sought compensation benefits and medical treatment. The carrier denied these claims based on the statute of limitations. The JCC upheld this determination, but never specifically addressed the test set forth in USS Agri-Chemicals, supra. This was error. Reversed and remanded for application of the USS Agri-Chemicals test.
ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nelson v. Henkels & McCOY, 641 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…everse and remand for a determination of whether the claimant would have qualified for employer-furnished medical treatment if he had not been incarcerated. USS Agri-Chemicals v. Waddell, 537 So. 2d 111 (Fla.1989); Tauben v. Joe’s Stone Crabs, Inc., 632 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Reversed and remanded. BARFIELD, MINER, and WOLF, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Uss Agri-Chemicals v. Waddell, 537 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 1989)