JANE GENTILE-YOUD, APPELLANT,
v.
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF HARRIET RUDNICK, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Jane Gentile-Youd appeals from an order of the trial court appointing Perry Rudnick as Plenary Guardian of the Person of Harriet Rudnick. We affirm.
“This court will not disturb the trial court’s findings, which are presumed correct, unless they are totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence.” Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So. 2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also Randy Int'l Ltd. v. American Excess Corp., 501 So. 2d 667, 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Because there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Perry Rudnick is best suited to be his wife’s guardian, we affirm the order appointing him as Plenary Guardian of the Person.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Lewis v. State, 711 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…ot come in here and lie. (Emphasis added). The law is clear that this type of vouching is completely improper. Cisneros v. State, 678 So. 2d 888, 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Davis v. State, 663 So. 2d 1379, 1380-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Clark v. State, 632 So. 2d 88, 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Landry v. State, 620 So. 2d 1099, 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Not satisfied with merely vouching for, and bolstering his witness’ testimony, the prosecutor then attacked the defense: MR. HYMAN: You know, I’ve prosecuted in t…
-
Servis v. State, 855 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…accident, and they came in here and told you what happened. They have no interest in how it’s decided. This attempt to bolster the officers’ testimony was impermissible. Landry v. State, 620 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also Clark v. State, 632 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (although the comments were not an affirmative statement of the prosecutor’s belief in the veracity of the police officer -witnesses, the prosecutor’s argument constitutes an inappropriate attempt to persuade the jury that the po…
-
Cisneros v. State, 678 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…es Officer Hadden and Officer Kahir have to gain by putting their careers in jeopardy, tak [*890] ing the stand and perjuring themselves? (Emphasis added) On January 26,1994, we condemned another nearly identical closing argument in Clark v. State, 632 So. 2d 88, 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). The condemned remarks were as follows: [W]ould they [the police] actually put their credibility with this Court, put their jobs on the line by coming in here and risking getting caught by not telling the truth in reference…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carmine Marrone v. Miami Nat'l Bank, 507 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Randy Int'l, Ltd. v. Am. Excess Corp., 501 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)