SHIDARA INVESTMENTS CO., N.V., A NETHERLANDS ANTILLES CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Miller v. Aldrich, 685 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
  …See Wong v. Crown Equipment Corp., 676 So .2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Adkins v. Economy Engineering Co., 495 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Cassel v. Price, 396 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 407 So. 2d 1102 (Fla.1981); Hurst v. Astudillo, 631 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); McCormick Shipping Corp. v. Warner, 129 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). Miller had the initial burden of establishing why he fell from the ladder, and some link between his fall and a breach of a duty owed him by one of the appel…
• Smith v. Grove Apts., LLC, 976 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
  …lity against grove owner by employee of independent contractor); Miller v. Aldrich, 685 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(premise liability action against private homeowner); Ortiz v. Lorie, 921 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(same); Hurst v. Astudillo, 631 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). See also Quintanilla v. Coral Gables Hosp., Inc., 941 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)(a purported medical malpractice action). In fact, the dissenting opinion cites to no decision involving the alleged negligence of a landlord that…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Bradshaw v. State Farm Auto. INS. Co., 714 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …judgment for that of the jury. See Garcia v. Lujando, 253 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). There was no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion for new trial on the basis of the jury’s 80%/20% liability determination. Schaller v. K-Mart Corp. 631 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). II. FUTURE MEDICAL EXPENSES The Bradshaws complain that the jury awarded them $1,000 per year in future medical expenses for only 22 years, despite the fact that the mortality tables introduced in this case showed that Robert’s…

Authorities Cited

• Am. Sec. Co. v. Goldsberry, 69 Fla. 104 (Fla. 1915)
• Font v. Lazarus Homes Corp., 339 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
• Gevertz v. Gevertz, 608 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)