FREDERICK E. MELVIN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-10-26
No. 93-2146
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
630 So. 2d 1139 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Novaton v. State, 610 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review granted, 624 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1993).

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We hereby certify to the Supreme Court that this case involves the same question, which is of great public importance, as the one involved in Novaton v. State, 610 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review granted, 624 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1993):

Does a defendant, who knowingly entered into a plea agreement, thereby waive an otherwise viable double jeopardy claim.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Melvin v. State, 645 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1994)
    …OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Melvin v. State, 630 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), in which the district court certified the following as a question of great public importance: DOES A DEFENDANT, WHO KNOWINGLY ENTERED INTO A PLEA AGREEMENT, THEREBY WAIVE AN OTHERWISE VIABLE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAIM[?] Id. We have…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw