LEE HYDER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LEE HYDER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
630 So. 2d 1137
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Public Records cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Hyder appeals from an order granting in part and denying in part his motion to compel the State Attorney’s Office to provide access to public records. We treat Hyder’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Roesch v. State, 596 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), review granted, 617 So. 2d 320 (Fla.1993).
We deny the petition because Hyder is not entitled to a copy of the State Attorney’s files free of charge. See Roesch. However, as in Roesch, we certify the following question:
WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE METHOD OF DISCLOSURE OF PUBLIC RECORDS HELD BY THE STATE ATTORNEY OR CLERK OF THE COURT WHERE THE RECORDS ARE REQUESTED BY AN UNREPRESENTED PRISONER WHO SEEKS THE RECORDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF?
RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hyder v. State, 636 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 1994)…PER CURIAM. We review Hyder v. State, 630 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), in which the court certified a question of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. On the authority of Roesch v. State, 633 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1993), in which the same certified question was answered, we approve the…
Authorities Cited
- Roesch v. State, 596 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)