AMENDMENT TO THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RELATING TO ADMISSIONS TO THE BAR RE: BOARD MEMBERS EMERITUS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts a rule allowing retired Board of Bar Examiners members to serve on hearing panels, with a majority of current members required on such panels.
[1] Retired members of the Board of Bar Examiners may serve on investigative and formal hearing panels to assist with an increased caseload.
[2] A majority of members on both investigative and formal hearing panels must consist of current Board members to ensure consistent application of current policy.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Florida Board of Bar Examiners petitioned to adopt a rule allowing retired members to serve on investigative and formal hearing panels due to an i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rules Of The Supreme Court Relating To Admissions To The Bar cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition of the Florida Board of Bar Examiners for the adoption of a rule which would create board members emeritus. We have jurisdiction under article V, section 15 of the Florida Constitution.
The board proposes the addition of subsection (c) to article I, section 2 of the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar which would authorize retired board members to sit on investigative and formal hearing, panels. The board suggests, however, that at least one member of the investigative hearing panel should be a current board member and that a majority of the members of a formal hearing panel should be current board members. The board provides the following rationale for the proposed amendment:
The Board has been experiencing an increase in its case load of formal and investigative hearings. There are presently over fifty cases awaiting a formal hearing. During the fiscal year for 1992-1993, the board conducted over 250 investigative hearings. The Board does not foresee the number of eases proceeding to a hearing to decrease in the future.
Pursuant to the Rules, an investigative hearing must be held before “a division of the Board consisting of no fewer than three members of the Board.” Article III, § 3.a. of the Rules. Formal hearings must “be conducted before a quorum of the Board which shall consist of not less than five members.” Article III, § 3.f. of the Rules. In the past, the Board has held nine monthly meetings and several special hearing panels each year at which the Board conducts both investigative and formal hearings. Such efforts, however, have been inadequate to allow the Board to schedule all hearings as expeditiously as the Board deems appropriate.
Furthermore, it is estimated that the average Board member currently contributes in excess of 300 hours each year in the performance of his or her duties as a bar examiner. Thus, the scheduling of more meetings and special hearing panels is not a realistic solution. After consideration of this matter, the Board concluded that additional assistance is needed. The proposed rule amendment provides such assistance by authorizing former Board members to participate on hearing panels.
Presently, there are 50 former Board members who are available to assist the Board. In a recent survey, such former Board members overwhelmingly expressed their willingness to participate should the Court adopt the proposed Emeritus rule. Even if only half of the 50 former members can assist the Board twice a year at hearings conducted in or near their home towns, such assistance would be sufficient to handle over 75 investigative hearings each year. To ensure that the current views of the Board are represented at a hearing, the rule proposal provides that an investigative hearing panel must have, at least, one current member and that a formal hearing panel must consist of a majority of current members.
The proposed amendment and the accompanying rationale were published in The Florida Bar News with the request that any comments thereon be filed with this Court by November 30, 1993. No comments were received.
We believe the board’s proposal has merit. Through the use of retired board members, the board should be able to conduct its hearings more expeditiously and thereby shorten the time prospective applicants must wait for determination of whether they may be admitted to the bar. However, in order to ensure consistent application of current board policy, we believe it is desirable that a majority of the members sitting at both the investigative and formal hearings should be current board members. Accordingly, we approve the adoption of article I, section 2.c. of the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar as set forth below:
c. Board Members Emeritus. Following the completion of their terms, members of the Board shall be designated as Board Members Emeritus. To assist the Board in fulfilling its investigative and adjudicatory functions, a Board Member Emeritus is authorized to participate as a member of an investigative or formal hearing panel as provided by Article III, Sections 3.a. and f. A majority of the members of the investigative and formal hearing panels shall consist of current members of the Board. To be eligible to serve on a hearing panel, a Board Member Emeritus shall be in compliance with the provisions of Article I, Section 3.e.
This amendment shall be effective when this opinion becomes final.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs re: Amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court of Fla. Relating to Admissions to the Bar, 676 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1996)…nce from the Court in late 1993. In response to the Board’s recommendation, the Court adopted an emeritus program by which retired Board members are authorized to sit on investigative and formal hearing panels. Amendment to the Rules of the Sup.Ct., 630 So. 2d 576 (Fla.1994). As a result of the successful implementation of the emeritus program, the Board is managing its caseload in a timely manner. Yet, the Board is incurring additional travel costs and expenses associated with the use of emeritus members in…
-
Fla. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs, 658 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 1995)…c. of the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar, which allowed retired board members to participate in Board hearings. Amendment to the Rules of the Supreme Ct. of Fla. Relating to Admissions the Bar re Board Members Emeritus, 630 So. 2d 576 (Fla.1994). We decided that this would help the Board conduct its hearings more expeditiously and thus shorten the waiting time for applicants for admission to The Florida Bar. Id. at 577. In adopting section 2.c., we decided that to ensure the con…1 / 2