BULK CARRIERS, INC., AND ROBERT P. KAPLER, APPELLANTS,
v.
TUAN ANH TRUONG, ET AL., APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Evidentiary Rulings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The appellant challenges a jury instruction given in answer to a question the jury asked. We find that there was no error in the minor modification to the standard charge. Even were it to have been error, a full review of the transcript convinces us it was harmless. See Edwards v. State, 351 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
Appellant also challenges as cumulative various other evidentiary rulings. However, the objections made at trial did not preserve most of these issues for appeal or they were harmless.
Having reviewed the full trial transcript, we find no miscarriage of justice which would warrant a new trial. § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1991).
DELL, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Anderson, 639 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1994)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Anderson v. State, 629 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), in which the [*610] Fourth District Court of Appeal certified its decision as being in conflict with McBride v. State, 604 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). We have jurisdiction1 and quash the decision under review. Johnnie Ander…
Authorities Cited
- Edwards v. State, 351 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
- Grant v. State, 351 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)