RICHARD LEE EDDY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICHARD LEE EDDY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
629 So. 2d 928
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The State concedes that appellant’s sentencing form contains a scrivener’s error. Accordingly, Eddy’s sentence is corrected to conform to the jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary of a dwelling with a battery or assault. We find Eddy’s remaining point on appeal to be without merit.
Sentence AFFIRMED as corrected.
DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fasig v. Fla. Soc'y OF Pathologists, 769 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…lity, there is not enough to demonstrate that appellants stand to gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment. See Morgareidge, 78 So. at 15; compare Heatherwood Community Homeowners Assoc., Inc. v. Florida Rock Ind., Inc., 629 So. 2d 928, 929 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)(1992)(“the only possible adverse effect that a judgment by the trial court could have on [appellant] would be to require it to be involved in representing its position in new hearings ... [t]his is not the kind of interest t…